1. Overview
LSTM’s Gender Pay Gap Report complies with the Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017, which stipulates the annual reporting of pay gap using standard statutory calculations. The data contained in this report relates to LSTM staff only. Employees of Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), iiDiagnostics and the Well-Travelled Clinic (WTC) are not contained within this set.
The data presented in this report represents all full pay relevant employees (in accordance with the prescribed calculation methodology) at the snapshot date of 31st March 2024.
Statutory reporting information is denoted by (*) Ethnicity Pay Gap reporting is not yet mandatory, but LSTM has chosen to report on this data in a similar manner to the Gender Pay Gap. The Ethnicity Pay Gap therefore shows the difference between the average earnings of white, and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) colleagues, expressed as a percentage of the earnings of white colleagues. The same snapshot date is used.
Our gender pay gap tells us that the difference between the median hourly rate for men and women is slightly higher than our pay gap last year at 8.46%.
2. Gender Pay Gap
At the snapshot date of 31 March 2024, our headcount of full-pay relevant employees was as highlighted below:
Gender Headcount |
|
Women |
63.7% |
Men |
36.3% |
The median and mean hourly pay gap (*) was:
Hourly rate pay gap |
||
|
2024 |
2023 |
LSTM median hourly rate pay gap |
8.46% |
5.6% |
LSTM mean hourly rate pay gap |
20.82% |
19.3% |
Our headline median gender pay gap has increased from 5.6% to 8.46% reversing the trend from the previous year. This has fluctuated in recent years – highlighting the impact that small changes in numbers can have.
Overall, our gender pay has reduced following increased representation of women within the upper pay quartile at LSTM and at senior leadership levels.
Representation across Pay Quartiles |
||||
Quartiles |
2024 |
2023 |
||
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
|
Upper quartile Q4 |
46.58% |
53.42% |
47.5% |
52.5% |
Upper middle quartile Q3 |
37.75% |
62.25% |
34.0% |
66.0% |
Lower middle quartile Q2 |
31.65% |
68.35% |
30.7% |
69.3% |
Lower quartile Q1 |
28.21% |
71.79% |
31.9% |
68.1% |
The chart above shows the distribution of staff across each pay quartile. There has been an increase in the proportion of women in the lower quartile, which has impacted both the hourly rate of pay for women and therefore the gender pay gap. Women continue to make up the majority throughout each quartile.
The proportion of males and females receiving a bonus is outlined below. LSTM did not run an institutional bonus scheme in 2023 – 2024.
Bonus Pay |
|
Gender |
Proportion % receiving bonus |
Women |
1.03% |
Men |
1.40% |
Total |
1.16% |
Due to the low numbers outlined in the table above, it is challenging to draw significant conclusions from the results.
Bonus Gap |
|
Bonus Pay Gap |
2024 |
Median Bonus Pay Gap |
0.00% |
Mean Bonus Pay Gap |
67.35% |
3. Ethnicity Pay Gap
At the snapshot date of 31 March 2024, our headcount of full pay relevant employees was:
Ethnicity Headcount |
|
Ethnicity |
% |
Non-BAME |
76.90% |
Asian |
6.24% |
Black |
9.11% |
Mixed |
2.70% |
Other |
2.02% |
Prefer not to say |
3.04% |
Using the five data categories, the pay gap is given below, measured in all cases against the average pay of those who identify as white:
Hourly Rate Pay Gap
|
||||
|
2024 |
2023 |
||
Ethnicity |
Median Pay Gap |
Mean Pay Gap |
Median Pay Gap |
Mean Pay Gap |
Asian |
8.46% |
21.65% |
8.25% |
25.15% |
Black |
-3.02% |
-3.29% |
-5.92% |
-8.47% |
Mixed |
-1.51% |
-1.94% |
2.47% |
-0.72% |
Other |
6.84% |
27.35% |
2.47% |
21.62% |
Prefer not to say |
5.67% |
6.92% |
-0.04% |
3.18% |
For colleagues who identify as Black or Mixed Ethnic heritage there is a small favourable pay gap. For colleagues who identify as Asian or Other heritage, there is an adverse gap. These numbers change year on year, illustrating the effect of small changes in our context. The broader picture highlights the need for greater representation of Black and Minority Ethnic colleagues across LSTM.
Hourly Rate Pay Gap (two factor) |
||
Ethnicity |
Median Hourly Rate |
Median Pay Gap (%) |
Non-BAME |
£23.53 |
|
BAME |
£22.85 |
2.89% |
Prefer not to say |
£22.20 |
5.67% |
A simplified (two-factor) analysis shows the median pay gap to be 2.89%.
Representation across Pay Quartiles |
||||||
|
Asian |
Black |
Mixed |
Non-BAME |
Other |
Prefer not to say |
Upper Quartile (Q4) |
2.74% |
10.27% |
1.37% |
82.19% |
0.00% |
3.42% |
Upper Middle Quartile (Q3) |
6.62% |
9.27% |
4.64% |
73.51% |
3.97% |
1.99% |
Lower Middle Quartile (Q2) |
6.96% |
7.59% |
3.16% |
77.22% |
1.27% |
3.80% |
Lower Quartile (Q1) |
8.33% |
8.97% |
1.28% |
75.00% |
3.21% |
3.21% |
There is greater representation of white colleagues in the upper pay quartile, than in the other quartiles proportionate to overall numbers. There is also slightly higher representation of Black colleagues.
LSTM did not run an institutional bonus scheme in 2023-2024. The proportion of BAME vs non-BAME receiving a bonus is outlined below:
Bonus Pay |
|
Ethnicity |
Proportion % receiving a bonus |
Asian |
0.00% |
Black |
0.00% |
Mixed |
0.00% |
Non-BAME |
1.50% |
Other |
0.00% |
Prefer not to say |
0.00% |
Two Factor Bonus Gap |
||
Ethnicity |
Median Bonus Pay Gap |
Mean Bonus Pay Gap |
Non-BAME |
||
BAME |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Prefer not to say |
100.00% |
100.00% |
4. Disability Pay Gap
At the snapshot date of 31 March 2024, our headcount of full-pay relevant employees was as highlighted below:
Colleagues with Disabilities Headcount |
|
Disabled |
6.91% |
Non-disabled |
89.54% |
Prefer not to say |
3.54% |
Total |
100% |
The median and mean hourly pay gap (*) was:
Hourly Rate Pay Gap |
||
Disability |
Median Pay Gap |
Mean Pay Gap |
Disabled |
13.68% |
16.29% |
Prefer not to say |
2.89% |
20.20% |
Representation across Pay Quartiles |
|||
Quartiles |
2024 |
||
Not Disabled |
Disabled |
Prefer not to say |
|
Upper quartile Q4 |
92.47% |
6.16% |
1.37% |
Upper middle quartile Q3 |
92.05% |
3.31% |
4.64% |
Lower middle quartile Q2 |
87.34% |
6.96% |
5.70% |
Lower quartile Q1 |
86.54% |
10.26% |
3.21% |
Proportionately, there are more people who identify with a disability in the lower pay quartile and fewer in the upper middle quartile. This affects the average hourly pay and impact the pay gap, as does the overall small proportion of colleagues within this cohort.
The proportion of people who received bonuses is revealed below. LSTM did not run an institutional bonus scheme in 2023-2024.
Bonus Pay |
|
Disability status |
Proportion % receiving bonus |
Disabled |
0.00% |
Not Disabled |
1.29% |
Prefer not to say |
0.00% |
All Staff |
1.16% |
Bonus Gap |
||
Disability status |
Median Bonus Pay Gap |
Mean Bonus Pay Gap |
Not disabled |
||
Disabled |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Prefer not to say |
100.00% |
100.00% |
5. Actions we are taking to close our pay gaps
We are working towards closure of our pay gaps. In doing so we recognise the disproportionate impact of small movements in our headcount.
To close our gender pay gap, we will continue to build on the progress of increasing representation of women at senior and leadership levels at LSTM and to increase gender diversity at all levels of the organisation. We hold an Advance HE Athena Swan Silver award for our work in furthering gender equity. Associated with this is a comprehensive action plan which incorporates in detail our steps to close the gender pay gap.
To address our ethnicity pay gap, our aim is to increase representation at all levels in LSTM and particularly at senior academic levels. We have committed to submitting an application to the Advance HE Race Equity Charter for a bronze award. As part of this work we are understanding and analysing barriers to progression at LSTM. A detailed Race Equity Action Plan supports our work in furthering race equity.
This is the first year we have monitored our Disability Pay Gap, and we are committed to continuing to do so. Our priority will be to develop a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to the pay gap, in order that we can respond accordingly. In doing so, we will work with our Disability and Carers Network.